contestada


In what way does deconstructionism differ from all other approaches to literary criticism?

A. Deconstructionists examine the language of a text closely.
B. Deconstructionists believe that a text must be understood in its historical context.
C. Deconstructionists look for contradictory elements that interrupt the text’s unity.
D. Deconstructionists explore how other works influence a reader’s response to a particular text.

Respuesta :

BlueSky06
The appropriate response is letter B. Deconstructionism varies from all different ways to deal with artistic feedback in that deconstructionists searches for conflicting components that interfere with the content's solidarity. Deconstructionism depends on the introduce that quite a bit of mankind's history, in attempting to comprehend, and afterward characterize, reality has prompted different types of control - of nature, of ethnic minorities, of poor people, of gay people, and so on.
scouteo

The correct answer is B) Deconstructionist believes that a text must be understood in its historical context.

The way in that deconstruction differs from all other approaches to literary critic is that Deconstructionist believes that a text must be understood in its historical context.

Deconstructionism is a literary movement that questions assumptions about identity, and truth, and distinctions examining the language of texts. It started in the 1960s by Jaques Derrida, a French philosopher. Deconstruction's goal is that people see philosophy in the Western world. Derrida said that Deconstructionism has rules for interpretation, reading, and writing. So yes, The way in that deconstruction differs from all other approaches to literary critic is that Deconstructionist believes that a text must be understood in its historical context.